Hallucination Risk Checklist

Estimate hallucination risk from task instructions and context quality with deterministic guardrail checks.

Hallucination risk

0/100 (Minimal)

9

Total Checks

0

Triggered

0

Mitigations

Checklist results
okNo factual context providedweight 28

Model may fill gaps with plausible but unverified facts.

okRecency request without date controlsweight 18

Recency claims are error-prone without explicit cutoff dates.

okHigh-stakes domain without guardrailsweight 16

High-stakes topics require stronger evidence and traceability.

okCertainty pressure in instructionsweight 14

Forcing certainty suppresses honest uncertainty handling.

okExact numeric demand with weak contextweight 14

Exact numbers often require robust datasets and references.

okContext likely too short for the requested scopeweight 10

Large-scope tasks with short context increase unsupported synthesis.

okNo citation requirement despite factual taskweight 9

Without citation rules, unsupported claims are harder to detect.

okAmbiguous pronoun-heavy requestweight 8

Ambiguous references can cause incorrect entity resolution.

okPotentially conflicting instructionsweight 8

Conflicts increase behavior drift and inconsistent outputs.

Recommended mitigations

No high-risk mitigations needed.

Safer prompt starter

About This Tool

Hallucination Risk Checklist flags common prompt and context weaknesses that increase unsupported or fabricated outputs.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is risk score a model prediction?

No. It is deterministic scoring from prompt and context heuristics.

Can this replace human review?

No. Use it as a fast pre-check before manual or automated evaluation.

Is my prompt uploaded?

No. Analysis runs fully in your browser.